When you make or get a call or text with your mobile device, your carrier stores data about which cell tower transmitted your signal, in the general territory where you might be located when that transmission happened. Courts have been differing for quite some time about whether this information accumulated by your cellphone provider can be acquired without a warrant. On November 29th 2017, a U.S. Court heard the case U.S. v. Timothy Carpenter to determine this issue. That case included a series of burglaries. The respondent’s physical vicinity to the thefts, as appeared by cell tower information, was utilized as evidence against him. Should the police have gotten a warrant before they gathered data about the whereabouts of Mr. Carpenter’s telephone and by expansion, Mr. Carpenter himself? As for the warrant prerequisite and the Fourth Amendment in the U.S. Constitution, the issue that emerges is the interesting. Before, the Supreme Court has expressed that individuals don’t have any idea of protection in records deliberately uncovered to a layperson, and hence, a warrant isn’t required. Be that as it may, when this run was figured, it was with regards to individuals currently giving their records to another person, such as giving over your money related records to your accountant. There is no person who is being given your cell site area information. That data is consequently gathered and put away to the point when some real individual needs to cooperate with it. The Stored Communications Act, or the SCA, is the governing statute that decides how law requirement can get put away advanced data. It was ordered in the 1980s to address how the Fourth Amendment applies to computerized data. Under this law, non-content data, similar to cellphone area information, can be acquired without a warrant.