Many individuals fantasize about sensational approaches to stop their employment. One mysterious Twitter representative purportedly followed up on one such dream. For eleven minutes in November of 2017, President Trump’s own Twitter account was deactivated. Twitter’s underlying clarification was that the deactivation was because of human error. In any case, it appears this was no mishap. Or maybe, it was a disobedient last activity of a worker on his or her last day of work. What comes after viral acclaim? Some lawyers caution that the ex-Twitter worker should get a lawyer. That is on account of a government cyber crime law, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. It has been deciphered comprehensively by courts. The CFAA is typically thought of as a hostile to the hacking statute. In any case, prosecutors have contended in an assortment of circumstances that a specific respondent got to a PC without approval or surpassed approved access, infringing upon the CFAA. For instance, Lori Drew was arraigned under the CFAA for surpassing approved access to My Space’s servers after she made a phony profile to annoy her little girl’s cohort. Before Internet extremist Aaron Swartz commited suicide, prosecutors had been setting up a CFAA body of evidence against him for utilizing approved records to consequently download scholastic databases. All the more appropriately, the CFAA has been utilized to arraign workers who utilize their entrance to do uncalled for things. Be that as it may, courts differ about how the CFAA applies. On the off chance that the Justice Department chooses to arraign the person who erased the Twitter account, a great deal will turn on where the case is brought. In the Eleventh Circuit, a locale that incorporates Florida, Georgia, and Alabama, an administration representative named Roberto Rodriguez utilized his entrance to Social Security Administration databases to look into data about a few people throughout his life. The interests court confirmed his conviction for surpassing approved access under the CFAA. In any case, assist north, the Second Circuit arrived at the contrary conclusion. Gilberto Valle was on trial for utilizing government databases at the NYPD to look into data about a few people that he was keen on. For Valle’s situation, the court received a smaller definition for surpassing approved access and reasoned that acting with a shameful reason did not add up to unapproved get to.